Thursday, March 15, 2012

Should Dharun Ravi Have Testified?

What we don?t know is why Ravi acted so badly. In the prosecution?s version of the story, he is a criminal gay-basher. In the defense?s version, he is stupid and immature, a newbie freshman reacting to the ?shocking experience? of his gay roommate?s hook-up with a ?scruffy and homeless-looking and suspicious-looking? date. Not helpful for the defense was the testimony of M.B., the man in question, who was calm, clean cut, and entirely unsuspicious seeming on the stand (though at 30, M.B. was significantly older than Ravi and his friends). Ravi?s friends testified that he didn?t regularly make homophobic statements, but one student said he seemed ?uncomfortable? about gay people, and before M.B.?s return trip to the dorm, Ravi texted about wanting to ?keep the gays away.?

Source: http://feeds.slate.com/click.phdo?i=9a9bdeb99c319c9a69c6eb3be5b80e25

woody guthrie benson henderson 2012 dunk contest edgar vs henderson berkshire hathaway ufc 144 james jones

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.